Practical Process: What Do We Believe?
Roger Tregear opens his Column this month by asking what, as evangelists for BPM, do we believe are the essential and compelling elements of process-based management? Roger contends that in attempting to respond to that question, too often we try to explain BPM and process-based management by focusing on the How and the What of BPM. He proposes, instead, that we focus on Why and suggests a BPM Creed that serves that purpose. Do you agree with his Creed?
Roger Tregear
As a Consulting Director with Leonardo Consulting, Roger Tregear delivers BPM courses and consulting assignments around the world. Based in Canberra (Australia) Roger spends his working life talking, consulting, thinking and writing about analysis, improvement and management of business processes. His work with clients is on short and long term assignments, in organizational improvement and problem solving based on BPM capability development, and business process, analysis, improvement, and management. He is available to help small and large organizations understand the potential, and realize the practical benefits, of process-centric thinking and management. Contact Roger at r.tregear@leonardo.com.au.
Latest posts by Roger Tregear (see all)
- Practical Process: The 6 wastes of BPM - July 2, 2018
- Practical Process: Process architecture vs the organization chart: no contest - April 2, 2018
- Practical Process: A packet of seeds and a shovel is not gardening - December 4, 2017
- Practical Process: Lost-baggage processes - July 3, 2017
- Practical Process: Delivering artifacts, not value? - April 3, 2017
