A Practitioner’s Perspective: Weighing in on BPMN—What it’s good for, What it’s not
Is BPMN a lingua franca – suitable for use by both technical and non-technical audiences? This month, Alec Sharp enters this ongoing argument, presenting his perspective as a long-time consultant and BPM practitioner. Upon reading his Column, some readers will cheer, others will disagree vehemently. We`d like to know your thoughts.
Alec Sharp
Alec Sharp has managed his consulting and education business, Clariteq Systems Consulting Ltd., for close to 30 years. Serving clients from Ireland to India, and Washington to Wellington, Alec's expertise includes facilitation, strategy development, data management, and of course, business analysis and business process improvement. His popular workshops and conference presentations on these topics, conducted globally, consistently receive "excellent" ratings. Alec is the author of the recently-released second edition of "Workflow Modeling" (Artech House, 2008) which is widely used as a university text and is a best-seller in the field.
Contact Alec - asharp@clariteq.com.
Latest posts by Alec Sharp (see all)
- Practitioner’s Perspective: What’s Wrong With This Process? – A Closer Look at Assessing Business Processes - November 3, 2014
- Using Scope Models for Process Analysis—Fast Results for a Hurry-up World - May 5, 2014
- A Practitioner’s Perspective: Now’s Your Chance – What to Cover in an Executive Briefing on Business Processes - January 5, 2014
- A Practitioner’s Perspective: Peace Accord Reached! Process vs. Capability Debate Ends with a Whimper - October 1, 2013
- Practitioner’s Perspective: What’s in, what’s out?—Thoughts on Scoping Models - April 2, 2013
